POST
FORMULATION TESTS
Some
post formulation test of buccal tablet is following;
•
FTIR
•
Weight
variation
•
Mucoadhesive strength
•
Dissolution
test
•
Drug
content uniformity
•
Surface
pH
•
Swelling
study
FTIR (Fourier transform infrared
spectroscopy):
•
The light originates from the He-Ne laser
•
Half of the light is reflected 90 degrees and hits a fixed mirror, while
the other half passes through the beam splitter and hits the moving mirror
•
The split beams are recombined, but having traveled different distances,
they exhibit an interference pattern with each other
•
As they pass through the sample, the detector collects the interfering
signals and returns a plot of response v. mirror displacement known as an
interferogram. (19)


Weight
variation test:
Ten
buccal tablets of each formulation were weighed using an electronic balance and
average weight of ten tablets and standard deviation were calculated. (20)
Average weight
Specification:
|
Average Weight of Tablet, mg
|
Percentage
Difference |
|
130 or less
|
10
|
|
From 130 through 324
|
7.5
|
|
More than 324
|
5
|
Result:
%age
deviation of tablet is 99±0.45mg
Mucoadhesive strength:
A modified balance method was
used for determining the ex vivo mucoadhesive strength. Fresh sheep
buccal mucosa was obtained from a local slaughterhouse and used within 2 h of
slaughter. The mucosal membrane was separated by removing underlying at and
loose tissues. The membrane was washed with distilled water and then with
phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at 370C. The sheep buccal mucosa was cut into pieces
and washed with phosphate buffer pH 6.8. A piece of buccal mucosa was tied to
the glass vial, which was filled with phosphate buffer. The glass vial was
tightly fitted into a glass beaker (filled with phosphate buffer pH 6.8, at 37
± 10C) so that it just touched the mucosal surface. The buccal tablet was stuck
to the lower side of a rubber stopper. The two sides of the balance were made
equal before the study, by keeping a 5 gm weight on the right-hand pan. A
weight of 5 gm was removed from the right-hand pan, which lowered the pan along
with the tablet over the mucosa. The balance was kept in this position for 5
min contact time. The water (equivalent to weight) was added slowly with an
infusion set (100 drops/min) to the right-hand pan until the tablet detached
from the mucosal surface. This detachment force gave the mucoadhesive strength
of the buccal tablet in grams. (7)
Result:
Mucoadhesive strength of tablet is 4.92±0.11g
Dissolution Studies:
The United States Pharmacopeia
(USP) XXIII rotating paddle method was used to study the drug release from the
tablets. The dissolution medium consists of 500 ml of phosphate buffer pH 6.8.
The release was performed at 37 ± 0.50C, with a rotation speed of 50 rpm. The
buccal tablet was attached to the glass disk with instant adhesive (cyano
acrylate adhesive). The disk was allocated to the bottom of the dissolution
vessel. Five ml sample were withdrawn at predetermined time intervals and
replaced with fresh medium. The samples were filtered through Whatman filter
paper and analyzed after appropriate dilution by UV spectrophotometer at 320
nm. (20,7)
Result:
Drug release of tablet is 87.84%
Drug
content uniformity:
Ten
buccal tablets from each formulation were crushed and mixed separately. From
the mixture 4 mg of Tizanidine equivalent of mixture was extracted in 100 ml of
methanol. Amount of drug present in extract was determined using UV
spectrophotometer at 320 nm. This procedure was repeated thrice to get accuracy
in the result. (21,7)
Result:
Drug content of buccal tablet is
99.45±1.31%
Surface pH:
The surface pH of the buccal
tablets was determined in order to predict the possible irritant effects of the
formulation on the buccal mucosa. The buccal tablets were allowed swell at 37 ±
10C for 2 h in 40 ml phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The surface pH of swollen
buccal tablets was measured using pH paper. (22)
Result:
Surface pH of tablet is 6.91±0.35
Swelling
Study:
Three buccal tablets were weighed
individually (W1) and placed separately in 2% agar gel plates with the core
facing the gel surface and incubated at 370C ± 10C. At regular 1 h time
intervals until 6 h, the tablet was removed from the Petri dish and excess
surface water was removed carefully with filter paper. The swollen tablet was
then reweighed (W2) and the swelling index (SI) were calculated using the
formula given in equation. (23)
Swelling
Index = [(W2-W1)/ W1] × 100
Result:
Swelling
index of tablet after 8hrs is 50.21±1.33
1 comments:
If more people that write articles really concerned themselves with writing great content like you, more readers would be interested in their writings. Thank you for caring about your content.
vitalhealthrecipes
Post a Comment